论文代写靠谱吗?,留学生CS代写|Java编程|C作业|C++程序|Python代码代做

ASSIGNMENT代寫

麥考瑞assignment代寫:物理干預

2017-04-25 00:25

使用物理干預來限制智障人士一直是一個有爭議的問題。正如前面提到的,物理約束的定義是任何實際限制和控制個體運動、體力活動或正常進入身體的方法。使用物理約束,具有挑戰性的行為,是由個人誰有智力殘疾的理由提出了許多問題的理由,這種做法的道德,專業和法律理由。然而,它是有爭議的,在某些情況下,當與具有挑戰性的行為人不具有明顯的先行行為和所有其他的方法來控制和管理自己的行為失敗了,身體約束可能是最后離開的專業照顧者無可選擇地使用身體約束或保護自己,或其他服務的用戶個人自己(玉髓,2005,p178)。因此,可以說,它僅僅是道德上的自我傷害行為時使用身體約束權當行為造成傷害他人的嚴重風險和辯論,任何處理不遵守不正當理由的物理限制,除非治療防止對個人的危害。
麥考瑞assignment代寫:物理干預
Using physical interventions to restrict people with intellectual disabilities has always been a controversial issue. As already mentioned the definition of physical restraint is any method of actually confining and controlling an individual’s independence of motion, physical activity, or normal access to his or her body. The rationale for using physical restraint for challenging behaviour that is displayed by individuals who have intellectual disability raises many questions about the justification for such practice on ethical, professional and legal grounds. However, it is debated that in some cases when the person with the challenging behaviour has no obvious antecedent behaviour and all other methods to control and manage his/her behaviour have failed, physical restraint may be the last resort and leaves the professional caregivers no alternative but to use physical restraint to either protect themselves, other service users or the individual themselves (Braine, 2005, p178). Therefore, arguably, it is only ethically right to use physical restraint during self-injurious behaviour and when the behaviour poses a serious risk of harm to others and it is debated that non-compliance with any treatment is not a justifiable reason for physical restraint unless the treatment is administered to prevent harm to the individual.

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Essay_Cheery
微信